Popular Posts

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

More Outrage (or, how the Internet proves anything for anyone)

I may have to retract my prior claim that it's an outrage that people accuse Bush of knowing that Iraq had no WMD (at the time of the war, that is). I did some research, and it looks like maybe Bush knew about 9/11:

http://www.buzzflash.com/perspectives/911bush.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/16/attack/main509294.shtml

http://www.mikehersh.com/article_65.shtml

Further, Bush clearly authorized the torture in Abu Ghraib:

http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/1348

And the news of Bush authorizing military incursions into up to 20 countries is particularly troubling:

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/nov2008/oper-n11.shtml

Also, it seems that Bush knew about the devastation Katrina would bring, the day before it happened:

http://pol.moveon.org/katrina/bushknew.html

I have, however, found less evidence that Bush knows about the aliens in Roswell, although see this about his veep, setting up a shadow government in Area 51:

http://assimilatedpress.blogspot.com/2006/07/cheney-sets-up-shadow-government-in.html

What did Cheney know, and when did he know it?

More. I've found evidence of a shadow government set up by the Bush administration, the so-called COG:

http://shininglight.us/archives/2008/10/bush_administration_running_shadow_government.php

And what's up with the connection between Bush Republicans and Osama Bin Laden?:

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html


I'm pleased to report on this blog, however, that I've found no real evidence that Bush knows about the Lochness Monster, or Bigfoot. I'm trying to confirm talk of a Yeti cover up from those seething with hatred of the Bush administration who reside in remote areas of the Himalayas.

Will keep all posted.

1 comment:

mijopo said...

"I may have to retract my prior claim that it's an outrage that people accuse Bush of knowing that Iraq had no WMD "

Actually what you claimed, in the prior post anyway, was,(a) "It's Outrageous to Call Bush a Liar" and then, more specifically (b) "it's outrageous to say that Bush lied to the American people about the existence of the WMD to get us into Iraq", which is a different thing entirely.

As to the rest of what you're saying here, I'm trying to interpret it as a response to my objections yesterday. If it is, I'm having trouble constructing the argument that you're making. Could you spell it out for me?