tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4981739266034213538.post672584483881297177..comments2023-07-25T05:54:36.811-07:00Comments on thaxis: We were blind, and now we seeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4981739266034213538.post-18168676547371597422009-03-30T19:49:00.000-07:002009-03-30T19:49:00.000-07:00But I think the Global Cooling scientists in the 1...But I think the Global Cooling scientists in the 1970s made into mainstream media. They weren't just a fringe group like they are now. So the point still stands, doesn't it?Erik J. Larsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00992991998553823280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4981739266034213538.post-88783308793632495652009-03-26T13:37:00.000-07:002009-03-26T13:37:00.000-07:00You're ignoring a key element of Mooney's response...You're ignoring a key element of Mooney's response, i.e., <BR/><BR/>"Will suggested that widespread scientific agreement existed at the time that the world faced potentially catastrophic cooling. Today, most climate scientists and climate journalists consider this a timeworn myth."<BR/><BR/>In other words, Mooney isn't simply saying, "well, we got it wrong then, but we're smarter now" (which still wouldn't be such a silly argument to make given the substantial progress we've made in understanding climate change).mijopohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113114446433726232noreply@blogger.com